Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: yokosduo Date: Jan 11, 2011 2:42am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Cencorship at the Internet Archive

Agreed,

Prejudice, Discrimination, Hatred, Violence, Religious Extremism and Ignorance, are non socially redeeming values.

In regards to the IA terms of use wordy lawyer speak, can you give us the bullet points? cause reading that language makes my eyes dizzy.

And in terms of Wikileaks, i think the focus should be on the "Rat" within the Government who had access to and stole those files against his/her oath, not the media source that published them.


This post was modified by yokosduo on 2011-01-11 10:42:11

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Skobud Date: Jan 11, 2011 6:10am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Cencorship at the Internet Archive

"Prejudice, Discrimination, Hatred, Violence, Religious Extremism and Ignorance, are non socially redeeming values."

Brilliant deduction Rob. Perhaps if you would have used some of this logic you would not have run the Pub directly into the ground.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: yokosduo Date: Jan 11, 2011 7:28pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Cencorship at the Internet Archive

Who exactly is "Rob" and where exactly is the "Pub",

Bub!